"Lo que este libro escrito hace aprox. Having read it, I feel like I understand why.في ما قد يبدو بسيطاً تناول المواضيع الواردة إلا إنها في غاية الأهميةفي ما قد يبدو بسيطاً تناول المواضيع الواردة إلا إنها في غاية الأهميةفي مائتين وأنثي عشر مقالة يغوص الفيلسوف رينه ديكارت في أعماق انفعالات النفس يوضحها ويبين كيف يمكن للعقل السيطرة عليها . Descartes indicates that they must be harnessed in order to learn which are good and bad for the body, and therefore for the individual (art. And some people fall in love with books about falling in love. Por más que para evaluar la obra debamos situarla en su propio contexto de conocimiento, creo firmemente que aquí R. Descartes da lo peor de sí, no justificado por el estado de la ciencia ni de la filosofía de su tiempo. Apparently, The Passions of the Soul is the one thing you don't bring up in conversation to people who profess to love Descartes. وجدت أفكار ديكارت بمجملها نبيلة ومنطقية وواقعية. The founding principle of philosophy is perhaps the astonishment, source of the questions. 0 Единственный инструмент, подДекарт уверен, о душе так, как он, ещё никто не размышлял. 25-9First published in French, Paris and Amsterdam 1649That there is a little kernell in the brain wherein the soul exercises her functions more peculiarly than in the other partsIt is also necessary to know, that although the soul be joyned to all the body, yet there is some part in that body wherein shee excercises her functions more peculiarly than all the rest, and it is commonly believed that this part is the brain, or, it may bee, the heart : the brain, because thither tend the organs of the senses; and the heart, because therein the Passions are felt; but having searched this businesse carefully, me thinks I have plainly found out, that that part of the body wherein the soul immediately exercises her functions is not a jot of the heart; nor yet all the brain, but only the most interiour part of it, which is a certain very small kernell, situated in the middle of the substance of it, and so hung on the top of the conduit by which the spirits of its anteriour cavities have communication with those of the posteriour, whose least motions in it cause the course of the spirits very much to change, and reciprocally, the least alterations befalling the course of the spirits, cause the motions of the kernell very much to alter.How this kernell is known to be the principall seat of the soulThe reason which persuades me that the soul can have no other place in the whole body but this kernell where she immediately exercises her functions is that I see: Let us then conceive that the Soul holds her principal seat in that little kernel in the midst of the brain, from whence she diffuseth her beams into all the rest of the body by intercourse of the spirits, nerves, yea and the very blood, which participating the Impressions of the spirits, may convey them through the arteries into all the members; and remembring what was formerly said concerning this machine our body, to wit, that the little strings of our nerves are so distributed into all parts of it that upon occasion of severall motions excited therein by sensible objects, they variously open the pores of the braine, which causeth the animall spirits contained in the cavities thereof, to enter divers wayes into the muscles, by whose means they can move the members all the severall wayes they are apt to move, and also that all the other causes which can differently move the spirits, are enough to convey them into severall muscles : let us here adde, that the little kernell which is the chief seat of the soul hangs so between the cavities which contain these spirits, that it may be moved by them as many severall fashions as there are sensible diversities in objects; but withall, that it may be moved severall wayes by the soul too, which is of such a nature, that she receives as many various impressions (that is, hath as many severall apprehensions) as there come severall motions into this kernell. Having read it, I feel like I understand why. Descartes describes the ontology of passion before the analysis of the psychology of the passions (what they are before saying how they are experienced).In Descartes, a passion is an idea that comes to me without the consent of my will, so it essentially a passive. Emotion is an emergence, a passivity without passion.“The passions are all good in their nature and we have nothing to prevent their misuse or their excess.” (Descartes, The Passions of the Soul)“The passions are the salt of life” (Descartes, The Passions of the Soul)– “Everything that is done or happens again is usually called by philosophers a passion for the subject to which it happens, and action in relation to that which happens. Welcome back. 211 and 212). The work is further divided, within the three greater parts, into 212 short articles which rarely exceed a few paragraphs in length. Bestaande uit (1) de bloedsomloop met het brandende hart als centrum en (2) het zenuwstelsel en de hersenen met de pijnappelklier in de hersenholten als centrum. This item: The Passions of the Soul and Other Late Philosophical Writings (Oxford World's Classics) by Rene Descartes Paperback $17.31 Rhetoric (The New Hackett Aristotle) by Aristotle Paperback $20.00 Sketch for a Theory of the Emotions (Routledge Classics) by Jean-Paul Sartre Paperback $18.51 Customers who viewed this item also viewed “(Descartes, The Passions of the Soul)– “For it is necessary to note that the main effect of all the passions in men is that they encourage and offer their souls to want the things that prepare their bodies: so that the feeling of fear incites him to want to escape, that of daring to want to fight, and so of others. Powered by WordPress. It is also necessary, therefore, that a man strive to master the separation which exists between the corporeal body and the mind. “(Descartes, The Passions of the Soul)The-Philosophy helps high-school & university students but also curious people on human sciences to quench their thirst for knowledge.The site thus covers the main philosophical traditions, from the Presocratic to the contemporary philosophers, while trying to bring a philosophical reading to the cultural field in general, such as cinema, literature, politics or music.Since 2008, The-Philosophy.com acts for the diffusion of the philosophical thoughts.Independent from any institution or philosophical thought, the site is maintained by a team of former students in human sciences, now professors or journalists. Por más que para evaluar la obra debamos situarla en su propio contexto de conocimiento, creo firmemente que aquí R. Descartes da lo peor de sí, no justificado por el estado de la ciencia ni de la filosofía de su tiempo.