Or I guess I could say I missed on some photos with both cameras! Fuji Provia 100F is currently slightly cheaper than Kodak Ektachrome E100 (at the time of writing). The Kodak Ektachrome image may have been shot just as the sun went behind a cloud as it was less bright vs the Provia example. The film was designed to be processed in the Kodak EKTACHROME Processing Kit, Process E-2, Improved Type. Earlier versions used E-1 through E-5. That saves hours in post processing for me! But Ektachrome isn’t the only professional grade E-6 slide stock around—there are many others! Kodak Portra 160 seems to be the cheapest option if you want to shoot medium format colour photos. $11.95 at B&H vs. $11.49 for PKR at B&H. (Rubbish test I know! It is easy to blow the highlights (lost highlight detail) and crush the blacks (lost shadow detail) with slide films. I’ve not shot a huge amount of colour film portraits but I was really impressed by the colours and detail of Provia. The recent re-release of Kodak Ektachrome 100 has sparked a growing buzz around slide film. Long story short: I … Ektachrome is a brand name owned by Kodak for a range of transparency, still, and motion picture films previously available in many formats, including 35 mm and sheet sizes to 11×14 inch size. Kodachrome vs. Ektachrome. Sadly there were no Provia examples from this set. (Great video!). There are several varieties of Ektachrome, usually the name Ektachrome coupled with the film speed. (Over the years there have been Ektachrome 64, 100, etc.) Cross process Ektachrome renders some of the best results possible of all slide film, and it will hide its age better than E6 for expired rolls. It was also quite grainy. Kodachrome vs. Ektachrome – A Film Simulation Showdown Posted on January 12, 2019 by Ritchie Roesch I have two very similar film simulation recipes that both produce results quite close to their namesake slide films: Kodachrome II and Ektachrome 100SW . Another thought is that Ektachrome was a line of film just like Portra is a line of film. Process E-3 was also introduced to the public. Kodak Ektar 100 grain is finer than Kodak Portra and Fuji Pro 400H.
New E100 needed such little adjustment that it’s not worth showing the pre-edited shot for simplicity’s sake. It really illustrates what I described above with regards to lost highlight and shadow detail. For a more accurate elimination of color cast, it is best to use an inverted color filter in Photoshop. Velvia has never been for people photos.
Side-by-side comparison of Kodachrome vs Ektachrome. I plan on seeing how new E100 renders under cross process in a follow-up comparison. With film cameras they are just different brand boxes to hold the film in.
Shooting with the sun rather than across it the Kodak Ektachrome blue skies looked good and the film captured nice skin tones. As with the Kodak Ektar portraits, the images are shot with a variety of film cameras (click each image for more info).As many people think you can’t do Fuji Velvia portraits here are a few portraits that I shot on Fuji Velvia film. Both are Kodak films, 100 speed, fine grain, saturated colour film stocks. Long story short. I will show them both, and you can decide which is best for you. See the latest film prices by clicking the links below –The closest match colour negative film to the colour positive slide film Ektachrome, is Kodak Ektar 100. I had a few examples that simply didn’t make the cut because the light would change and my metering was just slightly off.Also, when it came to editing the slides, old E100 needed a fair bit of love. No film is cheap, especially colour film but slide film is some of the most expensive. Many photographers preferred this because it could be developed in the home or business darkroom. Apologies!) To follow the Kodak Ektachrome E100 release blog post here is the new Kodak Ektachrome vs Fuji Provia 100F comparison, shooting portraits in Poland. As I was thinking about this, I was reminded of the old "Kodachrome vs. Ektachrome"… Have to say I never used Ektachrome because I was more than satisfied with Kodachrome. He shot his iconic Afghan-girl portrait on Kodachrome and returned 17 years later to photograph the same woman with Kodak's easier-to-develop Ektachrome. That being the case I was shooting with the Ektachrome in mind and if I got chance I tried to shoot some Provia too. Prints (RA-4) produced of my South Pacific trip in 1994 are jarringly grainy against prints made from RDPIII or RVP50. The newly re-released Kodak Ektachrome is back in business! I have two very similar film simulation recipes that both produce results quite close to their namesake slide films: What I wanted to do here is compare the two film simulation recipes side by side. 1-2-1 Photography and Lighting Tuition also available. It's a nice, natural film. In the past 120 Kodak Ektar was cheaper than Portra 160. I would if Fuji Provia 100F didn’t exist! Portra is a low-saturation, low contrast colour negative film with a crazy wide exposure latitude. Fuji GA645 Review, Comparison & Guide 2019 | 60mm f/4 | Portraits & Wedding In fact, McCurry's photographic career perfectly traces the rise and fall of Kodak film. Well, it’s exciting to see that Kodak resurrecting old stocks, as more and more people are coming back to analog.